[Physics] Milky way black hole missing?

Ilja Schmelzer ilja.schmelzer at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 13:19:11 CET 2019


2019-02-19 9:36 GMT+06:30, Doug Marett <dm88dm at gmail.com>:
> I wonder if there is a connection with this kind
> of object and the ejected quasars from galactic cores that are described by
> Halton Arp:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U-HJGhvN0w since these
> quasars also have peculiar redshifts and appear to originate from the
> parent objects currently considered to be black holes.

This would be a possibility.  I have thought about this.  It is not
completely impossible.

A problem would be that in my ether theory there is one parameter
defining the redshift of such a frozen star, and the same parameter
defines the turning point of the Big Bounce which replaces the Big
Bang.  So, the estimates we have about the very early universe give an
upper bound for this parameter, and with this upper bound, the
redshift would be so extreme that this would be too much, quasars
would be invisible.

But, no, that does not mean that this idea has to be given up.  My
Lorentz ether is purely elastic, reversible in time, no
thermodynamics.  It may be simply the elastic limit for small
oscillations, while the evolution of the universe is covered by
thermodynamic effects which yet have to be developed.  So, I have not
given up this idea completely.



More information about the Physics mailing list