[Physics] Splitting the Gravitational Constant

[Ruud Loeffen]

Hello Mike.

Thank you for your explanation.  It's amazing that you constructed a
completely new system with your DAPU units. I saw also your tables of these
units at
http://www.maldwynphysics.org/Equal%20strength%20of%20gravitation%20and%20charge%20fields%20Tables.pdf
It's really amazing. This must be the result of many years of hard work. I
can't follow your calculation in detail, but I trust that you are very
competent in your DAPU analyses and that the calculations are correct. I
also can accept that it is possible to use these units instead of the
mainstream-accepted constants and values.
Now I would like to know from you: Do these impressing DAPU units give you
a clear view on "Why the stone is falling"? You calculated:

*The DAPU/SI relationship is A(SI)/A(DAPU) = G^-0.5 so thatg (SI) = g(DAPU)
* G^-0.5 = 8.0048x10^-5 / 8.169639x10^-6 = 9.798 ms^-2*
being the same as: mg = GmM/r^2
Can you relate a PHYSICAL MEANING for your DAPU calculation? Does it show
this "in-stream" or "influx" of the energy-field to the center of mass? If
so, I would like to list your paper in chapter 5 "Inflow of energy" with
the other books/papers that are related to an "aether", and/or "in-stream"
from a universal (energy)field to the center of mass. If so: please explain
to me. Perhaps you have written a paper that could be informative at this
point?

Best regards.
Ruud Loeffen

Op do 21 nov. 2019 om 19:05 schreef <mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk>:

> Ruud,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Sure, I wouldbe happy for you to add my stuff to
> your list. In response to your question on gravity, here is what I think
> you are asking for....
>
> Force at surface  = mg = GmM/r^2
>
> Where (SI units)
>
> m = mass of any object in kg
> g = acceleration at surface in ms^-2
> M = mass of Earth in kg = 5.9722×10^24 kg
> G = 6.67430x10−11 m^3⋅kg^−1⋅s^−2
> r = radius of Earth from surface in metres  =  6.3781×10^6 m
>
> So      g = 6.67430x10−11 *  5.9722×10^24/( 6.3781×10^6)^2  = 9.798 ms^-2
>
> Check of powers
> mg = Y^1 * Y^7 = Y^8 = force = GmM/r^2 = Y^0 Y^1 Y^1/(Y^-3)^2 = Y^8
>
> In DAPU units the equation is now
>
> Force at surface  = mg = mM/r^2    (Note – No G)
>
> m = mass of any object in DAPU mass units
> g = acceleration at surface in DAPU acceleration units
> M = mass of Earth in DAPU mass units  = 4.879×10^19 DAPUMU
> G = not needed
> r = radius of Earth from surface in DAPU length units  =  7.8071×10^11
> DAPULU
>
> So      g = 4.879×10^19 /( 7.8071×10^11)^2  =  8.0048x10^-5 DAPUAU
>
> The DAPU/SI relationship is A(SI)/A(DAPU) = G^-0.5 so that
> g (SI) = g(DAPU) * G^-0.5 = 8.0048x10^-5 / 8.169639x10^-6 = 9.798 ms^-2
>
> When using DAPU units there is never any need to use G.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
>
> On 2019-11-21 04:28, Ruud Loeffen wrote:
> > Hello Mike.
> >
> > I read through your "Hypothetical Pre-Fermion TOE in 95 Theses M
> > Lawrence.pdf ". (
> >
> http://www.everythingexplained.co.uk/Hypothetical%20Pre-Fermion%20TOE%20in%2095%20Theses%20M%20Lawrence.pdf
> > )
> > I can see that you built up a theoretical world of _"myriad of the two
> > fundamental particles, a pair of positive and negative „meons‟,
> > which when merged form a zero mass black hole (ZMBH)"_. It's
> > interesting and this may present an important view on the emergence of
> > mass. There are some other theories that may be compared to your
> > approach. Also in my "Con-Fusing Gravitation" I listed a few theories
> > that depart from emergence of matter from elementary particles on the
> > _"background of the universe that produces a viscosity against which
> > all composite particles"_ arise.(chapter 5. The inflow of energy). If
> > you would agree to be listed there too, let me know. I can add your
> > book with the link.
> >
> > However. I would like to know if you can present an equation similar
> > to this one, that can be used to calculate the acceleration at the
> > surface of a planet (but then based on your theory). How would your
> > equation look?
> >
> > These are from chapter 3. 3. THE FALLING STONE. SPLITTING THE
> > GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT.
> >
> > I hope to hear from you again.
> >
> > Best regards.
> > Ruud Loeffen.
> >
> > Op do 21 nov. 2019 om 01:42 schreef <mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk>:
> >
> >> Ruud,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your email. Some of my further work showed that it is
> >> more
> >> useful to keep h, even though it is a dimensionless number, because
> >> it
> >> helps to keep sizes relative to observations better.
> >>
> >> So to give numbers to Earth’s gravity, best to use DAPU
> >> (double-adjusted
> >> Planck units). But the reason for gravity in either current SI or
> >> DAPU
> >> is the same – the effective depression of space time. I don’t
> >> want to
> >> jump into the full explanation of gravity here (I will give the
> >> hyperlink below) because it needs to be understood in logical steps.
> >>
> >> But put simply, the myriad merged particle/anti-particle ‘meons’
> >> that
> >> make up the universe become unmerged, form chains with other such
> >> pairs
> >> – each positive chasing a negative chasing a positive etc until
> >> the
> >> chains latch onto their own tails to form loops. Loops with three
> >> such
> >> pairs are our fermions. Loops with other than three pairs are dark
> >> matter. The merged pairs are the ‘background’ across which all
> >> relativistic motion occurs.
> >>
> >> The particles and anti-particles – the only real objects in the
> >> universe
> >> - have only properties of fundamental charge and mass. When they
> >> unmerge, each spins (not the usual spin ½ h) to generate one-sixth
> >> the
> >> electron charge, either positive or negative, with the total
> >> generated
> >> always zero.
> >>
> >> In the fundamental particles, the chains, the loops and all
> >> combinations
> >> of loops like nucleons, the total of all energies present is always
> >> zero. How loops interact depends on how much of each type of mass
> >> and
> >> charge energy, and in what form, they each have.
> >>
> >> Specifically the mass energy of positive meons in a loop will be
> >> exactly
> >> the same size and opposite sign to the mass energy of the negative
> >> meons
> >> in that loop. So all loops have total fundamental mass energy of
> >> zero.
> >> But the loop still has a frequency of rotation and a physical size.
> >> It
> >> is the effect of, firstly, the physical size of the loop and,
> >> secondly,
> >> the action of other nearby loops and the background merged pairs
> >> that
> >> act as if they are being deflected by space time.  I think of the
> >> loop
> >> as floating on the background, with the defection dependent on the
> >> area
> >> of the loop- larger mass loops have higher frequencies of rotation
> >> and
> >> thus smaller areas, so ‘sink’ further.
> >> So that is my explanation of gravity, and the sum total of all the
> >> loops
> >> that make up the Earth gives the acceleration at the surface.
> >>
> >> The latest paper I have had published explains the above and more,
> >> although it is structured more as list of hypotheses that need to be
> >>
> >> understood in order to see how the whole picture. It is like taking
> >> the
> >> current interpretations of much of physics as a jigsaw where pieces
> >> have
> >> been wrongly forced in place and showing that the pieces fit better
> >> in
> >> different places and the result is a different picture – although
> >> with
> >> all the observations retained.
> >>
> >> The hyperlink is www.everythingexplained.co.uk/Hypothetical [1]
> >> Pre-Fermion
> >> TOE in 95 Theses M Lawrence.pdf
> >>
> >> Hope it helps you.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> On 2019-11-19 09:10, Ruud Loeffen wrote:
> >>> Dear Mike.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for sending me your paper-link. I read through your
> >> document.
> >>> It's very interesting. It's important to try to find the fundament
> >> of
> >>> the units and the constants in physics.
> >>>
> >>> My approach is  different from yours. I am not a physicist and not
> >> a
> >>> mathematician. I just want to know "Why the stone is falling" In
> >> your
> >>> paper I saw some remarks, that I recognize. As this one: _"To
> >>> correctly understand the relationships between properties the
> >>> fundamental constant G needs to be split equally between both mass
> >> and
> >>> distance properties and h equally between both mass and charge
> >>> properties on the one hand and distance on the other "_
> >>> Sure, your approach is different and on a very more fundamental
> >> level.
> >>> However, there may be some interesting connections on a less basic
> >>> level. I would like to know from you how you would explain the
> >> 9.81
> >>> m/s^2 acceleration at the surface of the earth. HOW WOULD YOUR
> >>> EQUATION LOOK LIKE WITH THE BREAKDOWN OF THE UNITS? I think there
> >> must
> >>> be some connection. I would also like to know: Do you have some
> >>> insights or hypothesis related to the physical reality that we
> >>> experience every day? There must be a physical reality built up
> >> from
> >>> the fundamental dimensionless parameters that you proposed? If you
> >>> have such a paper or if you have some ideas about that, I would
> >> like
> >>> to hear.
> >>>
> >>> I hope you will read through my book and if you see connections,
> >>> please let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards.
> >>> Ruud Loeffen.
> >>>
> >>> Op di 19 nov. 2019 om 06:58 schreef <mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk>:
> >>>
> >>>> Ruud,
> >>>>
> >>>> Apologies, hyperlink should be
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/how-si-units-hide-the-equal-strength-of-gravitation-and-charge-fields-2090-0902-1000151.pdf
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Mike
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20191122/a6f6c812/attachment.html>