[Physics] Mathematical proof Maxwell's equations are incorrect?

[mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk]

Tom,
you have good arguments on the distribution of mass across a galaxy, but 
if the distance to the galaxy were halved (if that is the percentage 
that the viscosity red shift accounts for, although I do not say it is 
that much)then the velocities of the outer arms will be that much lower 
since the rotationl rate will not be different.
Cheers
Mike

On 2020-04-27 13:52, Tom Hollings wrote:
> Food for thought there Mike ( I think we have conversed previously),
> but I disagree on some points. I agree that the SM is wrong, but for
> different reasons. There is no dark matter, DM was designed (invented)
> to get over the differences between Einstein's relativity and
> observations, especially concerning the rotation of galaxies. The slow
> rotation (slower that it should be), can be accounted for using
> classical physics, if the correct base line is used. The next
> paragraph is from memory as I recently upgraded my PC and lost all
> saved internet document addresses.
> 
> The model used for calculating the rotation of galaxies assumed that
> galaxies are point sources for gravity, but when the mass of the
> galactic arms is considered, and the  gravity distribution along those
> arms is taken into account along with the central galactic mass, the
> rotational speed is seen to be much slower. Only classical physics is
> needed to calculate this. The path of our sun, using the same maths,
> can be calculated on its journey across the spiral arm in which we
> are.
> 
> You also say "An unmerger event within our only universe goes off
> randomly..." Do we take that to mean without cause? If so, it cannot
> be, as there can be no effect without cause. There is also something I
> read somewhere about two oppositely charged and opposite spin
> particles merging, and therefore becoming "invisible".
> 
> Tom Hollings
> 
>> On 26 April 2020 at 17:18 mikelawr at freenetname.co.uk wrote:
>> 
>> Guys/gals,
>> 
>> Your discussion is interesting, and touches on some aspects that I
>> think
>> I may be able to add some value to, if you are interested.
>> 
>> Firstly, there is a way to provide a single solution to all the
>> paradoxes that haunt us due to the over-simplistic foundation that
>> is
>> the Standard Model. It uses only one incompressible particle (and
>> its
>> anti-partner) to provide both an aether-like background and a single
>> 
>> loop structure where the number of pairs of the
>> particle/anti-particle
>> defines whether the loops are normal matter or dark matter. The
>> background is where the pairs are wholly or partially merged - fully
>> 
>> merged means nothing observable, partially merged and spinning,
>> vibrating or moving, produces magnetic lines of force and
>> gravitational
>> frame dragging when in strings attached to the loops.
>> 
>> Each particle/anti-particle when unmerging fully, to become a
>> separated
>> pair, which spin and move relative to the background and generate
>> one-sixth the electron charge each, positive or negative depending
>> on
>> screw sense but always totaling zero for a pair. Pairs like these
>> chase
>> each other, latch onto other pairs to form chains or strings which
>> then
>> catch onto their own tails to form loops, as mentioned already. The
>> loops formed from three pairs are our leptons. Loops of other pair
>> numbers are dark matter.
>> 
>> So total charge in the universe is always zero and the extra degrees
>> of
>> freedom provided by the loops means that the definition of matter
>> and
>> anti-matter is changed. The anti-loop to a spin plus one-half
>> electron
>> is a spin plus one-half positron. So a photon is a perfectly neutral
>> 
>> spin plus one double-loop. The only difference between matter and
>> anti-matter is its charge. If a positive charge proton (a stack of
>> loops) is defined as normal matter, then the electron is
>> anti-matter.
>> Thus matter and anti-matter do not destroy each other on contact,
>> but
>> form neutral systems like atoms and photons. So anti-matter is
>> hiding in
>> plain sight and a battery is a matter/anti-matter device.
>> 
>> An unmerger event within our only universe goes off randomly. The
>> cascade of other pairs unmerging drives loop formation at high
>> energy -
>> small loop radius - which then results in collisions between loops
>> and
>> inflation as the particle/antiparticles in the loops keep their
>> momentum unchanged. Most such inflation events fail - the inflation
>> does
>> not release enough energy from the loops to boost the now larger
>> loops
>> away from the original event. These failed big bangs are
>> cosmological
>> black holes dotted throughout the universe acting as frameworks for
>> our
>> subsequent successful big bang to expand through and new loops to
>> coalesce around.
>> 
>> Progress through the background requires energy and decreases the
>> rotational rate of the loops, which is a measure of their energy.
>> Single
>> loops require 'topping up' by photons. Photons lose energy almost
>> directly proportional to the distance through the background that
>> they
>> have travelled, almost completely regardless of loop frequency. This
>> is
>> a viscosity red shift, because the effect of the background friction
>> is
>> like a viscosity in a fluid, which has not yet been taken into
>> account
>> in observation of stars. So the universe may be much smaller than
>> currently estimated. The local background viscosity provides a local
>> 
>> maximum velocity for the photon, much like the air producing a
>> terminal
>> velocity to a parachutist. Gravity is the slope of the local
>> viscosity
>> gradient.
>> 
>> General relativity rules in the background environment because of
>> its
>> viscosity. There is a local maximum velocity to all travel through
>> the
>> background, energy is lost in all motion and so no action is
>> reversible
>> and there is an arrow of time. Quantum mechanics exists in the
>> tunnels
>> formed between loops that have been merged, as in a photon, and
>> subsequently separated in space. The tunnels exclude the background
>> and
>> thus there is no maximum speed limit. The loops randomly move along
>> the
>> tunnel swapping ends continuously, no matter how far the two have
>> separated in space. The properties observable are the sum of the
>> time
>> spent by each loop at each end and when sufficient perturbation
>> breaks
>> the tunnel, each loop is stuck at whichever end it then occupied.
>> The
>> result is non-locality and probability. When two entangled photons
>> are
>> split in an experiment, the photon observed passing through a filter
>> 
>> will not necessarily be the same one observed exiting as they
>> continually swap between paths.
>> 
>> We have only one universe because there is only one size of particle
>> and
>> anti-particle, there are only two forces at work, due to the
>> fundamental
>> mass and charge - other forces are derivatives - and only one basic
>> structure formed - the loop. There is no place where physics breaks
>> down
>> because the particle and anti-particle building blocks are the
>> incompressible and unbreakable densest and smallest possible Planck
>> sized black holes. Only the loops can be broken back into chains or
>> strings as they enter a cosmological black hole - which is really a
>> chain or string star.
>> 
>> There is a lot more to this hypothesis, so I have attached a recent
>> paper that was published as part of the Vigier series of
>> conferences.
>> And I have also attached a very recent pre-print of a paper on
>> Maxwell
>> and other electromagnetic equations and how to reinterpret them in
>> terms
>> of mechanical properties. This may or may not help in the original
>> discussion point, but I hope it makes you think.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Mike Lawrence
>> 
>> Physics mailing list
>> Physics at tuks.nl
>> http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics