[Physics] Maxwell extension

[Arend Lammertink]

Hello Arbab,

Thank you for your reply. I know Koen van Vlaenderen well. In fact, he was
one of the first to criticize my original description of gravitation.

I've cc-ed the physics mailinglist, so your papers may be discussed.

Best regards,

Arend.


Arend Lammertink, MScEE,
Goor, The Netherlands.

Please note that I'm currently overwhelmed with e-mails. If you're
interested in discussing science and/or physics, please consider
subscribing to the mailing list I created for that purpose:

http://mail.tuks.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/physics


On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Arbab I. Arbab <arbab.ibrahim at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Arend Lammertink,
> Thank you very much for your kind message. I really do agree that Maxwell
> equations are but not complete. Extension of Maxwell equations were met
> with rejection without reason. I have also made some publications in this
> regard. The first one appeared in
> http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2009/PP-17-03.PDF
>  and
> http://cpb.iphy.ac.cn/fileup/PDF/2013-3-030301.pdf
>
> In these papers I showed that the extension is inevitable. There is an
> engineer in the Netherlands who share the same ideas. His name is Koen
> van Vlaendere <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Koen_Van_Vlaenderen>n.
> I suggest if you are interested to organize an international
> conference that deals with these shortcoming.
> Thank you and good luck.
> Arbab
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Arend Lammertink <lamare at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear fellow dissident scientist,
>>
>> I have spent a lot of time analyzing the history of Maxwell's
>> equations and how those led to Relativity as well as Quantum Field
>> Theory. Based on that analysis, I found an astonishing inconsistency
>> in Maxwell's equations, which led to an incomplete model for
>> electromagnetics.
>>
>> For instance, Maxwell's equations predict only one type of
>> electromagnetic waves to exist, namely transverse waves, while in
>> actual fact at least two types of waves are known to exist, namely the
>> "near" and "far" fields:
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_and_far_field
>>
>> By correcting this inconsistency, we can come to a Unified model in an
>> elegant, consistent and natural way. Please find my abstract below.
>>
>> You can read the full article at my personal website:
>>
>> http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/AnExceptionallyElegan
>> tTheoryOfEverything
>>
>> I hope you are able and willing to consider my proposal and let me
>> know what you think about it. To me, it contains the answer I believe
>> science has been looking for, but of course you may differ in opinion.
>>
>> Kindest regards,
>>
>> Arend Lammertink, MScEE,
>> Goor, The Netherlands.
>>
>> P.S. I found your email address at:
>> http://editionsassailly.com/livres/climont%20full%20list%20htm.htm
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>> In a previous article, we stated that all currently known areas of
>> Physics' theories converge naturally into one Unified Theory of
>> Everything once we make one fundamental change to Maxwell's aether
>> model. In that article, we explored the history of Maxwell's equations
>> and considered a number of reasons for the need to revise Maxwell's
>> equations. In this article, we will make the mathematical case that
>> there is a hole in Maxwell's equations which should not be there,
>> given that we started with the same basic hypothesis as Maxwell did:
>>
>> A physical, fluid-like medium called "aether" exists.
>>
>> Maxwell did not explicitly use this underlying hypothesis, but
>> abstracted it away. This leads to a mathematically inconsistent model
>> wherein, for example, units of measurements do not match in his
>> definition for the electric potential field. By correcting this
>> obvious flaw in the model and extending it with a definition for the
>> gravity field, we obtain a simple, elegant, complete and
>> mathematically consistent "theory of everything" without "gauge
>> freedom", the fundamental theoretical basis for Quantum Weirdness
>> which we must therefore reject.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Conclusions
>>
>> By working out standard textbook fluid dynamic vector theory for an
>> ideal, compressible, non-viscous Newtonian fluid, we have established
>> that Maxwell's equations are mathematically inconsistent, given that
>> these are supposed to describe the electromagnetic field from the
>> aether hypothesis. Since our effort is a direct extension of Paul
>> Stowe and Barry Mingst' aether model, we have come to a complete
>> mathematically consistent "field theory of everything". And we found
>> "Maxwell's hole" to be the original flaw in the standard model that
>> led to both relativity and Quantum Mechanics, which should thus both
>> be rejected.
>>
>> ----
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------
> *A. I. Arbab, PhD, MInst.P., CPhys., FRAS*
>
>
>
> *Professor,Dept. of Physics, College  of Science, ِQassim University,
> KSA.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arbab_Arbab
> <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arbab_Arbab>http://staffpages.uofk.edu/arbab-arbab/
> <http://staffpages.uofk.edu/arbab-arbab/>*
>
>
> *http://www.livedna.net/?dna=249.1286
> <http://www.livedna.net/?dna=249.1286>Mobile: +966550790379
> <%2B966550790379>*
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.tuks.nl/pipermail/physics/attachments/20161019/4acd7f00/attachment.html>